Education, Healthcare and Energy Independence
This present management is adding on billions of money in debts onto our already damaged financial system while trying to persuade us this is the proper way to arrive at its goals of enhancing our knowledge program, offering cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom, not to mention turning around the financial system. Don't get me wrong, I am also for enhancing knowledge, cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom but the way this management is trying to arrive at these goals is like giving a hungry person a poultry food without deboning the poultry first. When they chew into the food and chip a tooth they are left with more dental bills than the food was value.
Better knowledge, cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom all sound great but are they value the debts that we are turning up now? What good will it do anyone if we acquire more debts in the process of achieving these goals than these programs are worth? I would like to see this management set main concerns with a clear explanation of how the main concerns were established and how they plan to achieve them. If our financial pitfall was due to from toxic loans where individuals gathered more mortgage debts than they could pay back, then how does this management plan to turn the financial system around and arrive at its goals by this same principle, that is, acquire more debts that you can repay?
Improving Education
Our present community knowledge program is a govt ran knowledge program where the govt demands which community university, according to university region, a student has to be present at. If our present university program is out of balance then it is due to govt participation. How do we anticipate to see an improvement in our knowledge program by allowing the govt to have higher management over our knowledge system? In order to require so called improvements the govt is going to want higher management.
I have often observed that madness is doing the same thing and expecting different results. If a govt ran knowledge program resulted in a low excellent to train and learning for our kids then how do we anticipate more govt participation to enhance the system? I for one would like to see the govt completely removed from running our knowledge program and let mother and father create choices regarding their children's knowledge. If mother and father decide of which university their kids will be present at then educational institutions will have to raise the amount and learning requirements to mom's or dad's requirements and not the government authorities.
If we take the tax money that we are currently spending on knowledge and give it to mother and father then mother and father are going to position their kids where they feel their kids will get the best knowledge. The educational institutions that are offering a better knowledge will attract more mother and father and these educational institutions will have more funds to pay instructors. Schools can then pay instructors according to performance levels and excellent of the entire knowledge program will enhance. Parents have this freedom with childcare and college and yet in between these decades our govt somehow knows what is best for our kids.
Affordable Healthcare
As I was preparing this article I observed a report on the radio about how the healthcare market was going to have lay offs due to failures from investment strategies. What captured my interest was the declaration that lay offs were due to failures from investment strategies. I thought the medical market was in company to offer medical proper care and not handle domain investment portfolios. Why is it then that lay offs are motivated by financial commitment failures and not from failures resulting from rising unemployment?
It has been widely revealed that increasing medical proper care expenses are due to spending for the without insurance and yet employment requirements are motivated from financial commitment values. Which brings me to another point that captured my interest, while the rest of the nation has been struggling with financial uncertainty the medical market obviously has an financial commitment profile that is strong enough that it takes until the spring of 2009 before its value effects significant lay offs.
The medical market has stated that price are related to the variety of without insurance as if everyone without medical proper care insurance is a pressure to the medical market. If I own a shop I may have to improve my costs to cover the failures from theft. It would not be moral of me to improve my costs based on the amount of individuals who enter my shop that don't have enough cash to pay and not base it on the real failures from taking.
What is the main point here for performing in the medical market. The formula is a simple one. Earnings less expenses is equal to profits or failures. If you create enough cash to handle an financial commitment profile then you are making a profit. If our govt wants to get involved with controlling medical proper care expenses then why can't it investigate the real cost structure for the healthcare market and quit providing us information about the amount of individuals that are without insurance. When the govt finds situations of overcharging then heavy charges will get everybody's interest.
Energy Independence
Our nation depends intensely on international oil and if our nation were power independent then the cash that we are spending to have oil shipped into our nation could remain in our financial system. This difference of spending international countries to offer the majority of our oil has been created the largest transfer of wealth in the history of the world and yet our nation still does not have a plan in position to reduce our dependancy on international oil.
Our political figures are lines kept in a debate as to whether exploration for our own oil is the answer. We are told that if we started exploration now that it would take several decades before any of the natural resources would be available for community consumption. Some political figures tell us that we need electricity to replace energy sources, but it will also take decades to arrive at this objective. Meanwhile our nation still needs power to conduct day to day activities.
Education, Healthcare and Energy Independence
This present management is adding on billions of money in debts onto our already damaged financial system while trying to persuade us this is the proper way to arrive at its goals of enhancing our knowledge program, offering cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom, not to mention turning around the financial system. Don't get me wrong, I am also for enhancing knowledge, cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom but the way this management is trying to arrive at these goals is like giving a hungry person a poultry food without deboning the poultry first. When they chew into the food and chip a tooth they are left with more dental bills than the food was value.Better knowledge, cost-effective medical proper care and power freedom all sound great but are they value the debts that we are turning up now? What good will it do anyone if we acquire more debts in the process of achieving these goals than these programs are worth? I would like to see this management set main concerns with a clear explanation of how the main concerns were established and how they plan to achieve them. If our financial pitfall was due to from toxic loans where individuals gathered more mortgage debts than they could pay back, then how does this management plan to turn the financial system around and arrive at its goals by this same principle, that is, acquire more debts that you can repay?
Improving Education
Our present community knowledge program is a govt ran knowledge program where the govt demands which community university, according to university region, a student has to be present at. If our present university program is out of balance then it is due to govt participation. How do we anticipate to see an improvement in our knowledge program by allowing the govt to have higher management over our knowledge system? In order to require so called improvements the govt is going to want higher management.
I have often observed that madness is doing the same thing and expecting different results. If a govt ran knowledge program resulted in a low excellent to train and learning for our kids then how do we anticipate more govt participation to enhance the system? I for one would like to see the govt completely removed from running our knowledge program and let mother and father create choices regarding their children's knowledge. If mother and father decide of which university their kids will be present at then educational institutions will have to raise the amount and learning requirements to mom's or dad's requirements and not the government authorities.
If we take the tax money that we are currently spending on knowledge and give it to mother and father then mother and father are going to position their kids where they feel their kids will get the best knowledge. The educational institutions that are offering a better knowledge will attract more mother and father and these educational institutions will have more funds to pay instructors. Schools can then pay instructors according to performance levels and excellent of the entire knowledge program will enhance. Parents have this freedom with childcare and college and yet in between these decades our govt somehow knows what is best for our kids.
Affordable Healthcare
As I was preparing this article I observed a report on the radio about how the healthcare market was going to have lay offs due to failures from investment strategies. What captured my interest was the declaration that lay offs were due to failures from investment strategies. I thought the medical market was in company to offer medical proper care and not handle domain investment portfolios. Why is it then that lay offs are motivated by financial commitment failures and not from failures resulting from rising unemployment?
It has been widely revealed that increasing medical proper care expenses are due to spending for the without insurance and yet employment requirements are motivated from financial commitment values. Which brings me to another point that captured my interest, while the rest of the nation has been struggling with financial uncertainty the medical market obviously has an financial commitment profile that is strong enough that it takes until the spring of 2009 before its value effects significant lay offs.
The medical market has stated that price are related to the variety of without insurance as if everyone without medical proper care insurance is a pressure to the medical market. If I own a shop I may have to improve my costs to cover the failures from theft. It would not be moral of me to improve my costs based on the amount of individuals who enter my shop that don't have enough cash to pay and not base it on the real failures from taking.
What is the main point here for performing in the medical market. The formula is a simple one. Earnings less expenses is equal to profits or failures. If you create enough cash to handle an financial commitment profile then you are making a profit. If our govt wants to get involved with controlling medical proper care expenses then why can't it investigate the real cost structure for the healthcare market and quit providing us information about the amount of individuals that are without insurance. When the govt finds situations of overcharging then heavy charges will get everybody's interest.
Energy Independence
Our nation depends intensely on international oil and if our nation were power independent then the cash that we are spending to have oil shipped into our nation could remain in our financial system. This difference of spending international countries to offer the majority of our oil has been created the largest transfer of wealth in the history of the world and yet our nation still does not have a plan in position to reduce our dependancy on international oil.
Our political figures are lines kept in a debate as to whether exploration for our own oil is the answer. We are told that if we started exploration now that it would take several decades before any of the natural resources would be available for community consumption. Some political figures tell us that we need electricity to replace energy sources, but it will also take decades to arrive at this objective. Meanwhile our nation still needs power to conduct day to day activities.
Education, Healthcare and Energy Independence
No comments:
Post a Comment